+44 207 488 9947












Case study: Final year chemistry student accused of plagiarism - Use of AI – Disciplinary Proceedings - RT Coopers drafted statement and advised client – Allegation dismissed after Disciplinary Committee Hearing

A final year BSc (Hons) student studying Chemistry (‘our client’) accused of suspected plagiarism in a literature review due to improper referencing. The literature review was for a final year chemistry project. The department did not mark the literature review due to alleged academic misconduct. Our client had a previous academic misconduct offence from the commencement of university. The university treats a prior offence combined with an alleged offence as serious. Therefore, as this was potentially a second offence, the university classed this suspected offence as a serious offence. Our client was facing exclusion with no award due to the seriousness of the alleged offence. Before instructing RT Coopers, our client had attended an Academic Integrity meeting denying academic misconduct. By the time RT Coopers were instructed to assist, our client had been advised by lawyers who had drafted a statement and advised our client on the responses for the investigative meeting. The investigative panel referred the case to a disciplinary committee. Our client now had to attend a disciplinary hearing before the committee.
Concerned
Our client came to us concerned about the outcome of the investigation stage and the likely outcome of the case as the case was referred to a disciplinary committee although a set of lawyers were instructed at the time and drafted the statement for the investigative panel.
Grounds for the Statement
RT Coopers drafted the statement for the disciplinary committee. The statement included the mitigating circumstances of our client and procedural irregularities that were identified by RT Coopers.
Hearing
Our client attended a hearing to defend the allegation of plagiarism.
Outcome
After the allegation was dismissed, the literature review was marked. Our client was awarded a degree and graduated with honours.
Commentary
What distinguished the advice of RT Coopers in this case from the previous lawyers was the attention to detail.
Review
‘Rosanna is the best ! She gave extremely helpful advice and guided us along the way to obtain a positive outcome in the hearing. She was always contactable, courteous and sincere and completely understood our concerns. I highly recommend Rosanna and her team’. EK

Link to Case Studies
Links to Reviews
All Reviews - Academic Appeals various subjects, Failure of Repeat Year, Failure of Resit, Failure of Placement & Withdrawn - Academic Integrity - Academic Misconduct and Academic Malpractice - Artificial Intelligence, Emerging Technologies, Database Design, Mathematics & Statistics - Business, Economics, MBA & Politics - Biomedical Sciences, Biopharmaceuticals & Biosciences - Cheating - Collusion - Complaints to the OIA against Universities - Dentistry Students - Disciplinary - Engineering & Manufacturing Engineering - Exclusions - Expulsions - Extenuating Circumstances - Failed resits for OSCE/ISCE/PACES - Failed resits for written paper - Failed resits - Failed retake year - Fitness to Study - Fitness to Practise - Medicine - Mitigating Circumstances - Panel Hearings - Pharmacy MPharm & GPhC Registration Assessment Appeals - PhD and MPhil Students - Plagiarism - Poor Referencing - Procedural Irregularities - Withdrawal - Withdrawn from University - Representation before Panels and Committees - Termination of Studies - Veterinary Medicine - Veterinary Students
Related Services
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()